Expose transaction receipt fields by bsiaotickchong · Pull Request #507 · lightsparkdev/grid-api

bsiaotickchong · 2026-05-26T23:29:11Z

Summary

Add optional transactionHash to reconciliationInstructions for destination-side crypto settlement receipt data.
Make reference optional so reconciliation instructions can contain only a transaction hash when no payment reference exists.
Add optional fees to incoming transactions, denominated in the receiving currency's smallest unit.
Rebuild bundled OpenAPI specs for openapi.yaml and mintlify/openapi.yaml.

Implementation Note

The public API stays storage-agnostic. In webdev, transactionHash is populated from hash-bearing Grid settlement references, including the existing USDC_SOLANA settlement reference type and the new generic CRYPTO type.

Testing

make build
make lint

vercel · 2026-05-26T23:29:16Z

The latest updates on your projects. Learn more about Vercel for GitHub.

Project	Deployment	Actions	Updated (UTC)
grid-flow-builder	Ready	Preview, Comment	May 28, 2026 6:01pm

github-actions · 2026-05-26T23:29:47Z

✱ Stainless preview builds for grid

This PR will update the grid SDKs with the following commit messages.

cli

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

csharp

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

go

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

kotlin

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

openapi

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

php

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

python

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

ruby

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

typescript

feat: Expose transaction receipt fields

Edit this comment to update them. They will appear in their respective SDK's changelogs.

⚠️

grid-openapi studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗

New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/AgentAccountRestrictions`

⚠️

grid-ruby studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ (prev: lint ✅) → test ✅

New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/AgentAccountRestrictions`

⚠️

grid-typescript studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ❗ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗ (prev: test ✅)

New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/AgentAccountRestrictions`

⚠️

grid-python studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ✅ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ✅
pip install https://pkg.stainless.com/s/grid-python/69008289e3703437a69675ddda646f1b1178b434/grid-0.0.1-py3-none-any.whl
New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/AgentAccountRestrictions`

⚠️

grid-csharp studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ❗ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗

New diagnostics (3 error, 12 note)

❗ InvalidInternalState: Internal error, please try again.

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

⚠️

grid-go studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ❗ → test ❗
go get github.com/stainless-sdks/grid-go@97556c53b9db185841d56939e56c54b55675b42b
New diagnostics (5 error, 8 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

❗ Model/GeneratedNameClash: Name clash may cause compile errors.

❗ Model/GeneratedNameClash: Name clash may cause compile errors.

❗ Model/GeneratedNameClash: Name clash may cause compile errors.

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

⚠️

grid-php studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → lint ❗ (prev: lint ✅) → test ✅

New diagnostics (4 error, 4 warning, 11 note)

❗ InvalidInternalState: Internal error, please try again.

❗ InvalidInternalState: Internal error, please try again.

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

⚠️ Name/Collision: Possible undesirable name generated for language

⚠️ Name/Collision: Possible undesirable name generated for language

⚠️ Name/Collision: Possible undesirable name generated for language

⚠️ InvalidInternalStateWarning: Something unexpected happened during codegen. Our team has been notified. Your SDK was still generated correctly, and no action is needed on your end. If you need help please reach out to support@stainless.com. --- Cannot have two defs with the same ID.
Provide a slug for at least one def to disambiguate them.

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

⚠️

grid-kotlin studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ✅ (prev: build ⏭️) → lint ✅ (prev: lint ⏭️) → test ❗

New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Java/NameNotAllowed: Encountered name `return` that conflicts with a [Kotlin keyword](https://kotlinlang.org/docs/keyword-reference.html#hard-keywords). Renamed to `return_`.
To provide a different name, use a merge transform.

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

⚠️

grid-cli studio · code · diff

Your SDK build had at least one new error diagnostic, which is a regression from the base state.
generate ❗ → build ❗ → lint ❗ → test ❗

New diagnostics (2 error, 10 note)

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `delete /cards/{id}`

❗ Endpoint/NotFound: Skipped endpoint because it's not in your OpenAPI spec: `get /cards/{id}/transactions`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/EmbeddedWalletConfig`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftExternalAccountCreateInfo`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/SwiftBeneficiary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardMerchant`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardPullSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardRefundSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/CardSettlementSummary`

💡 Model/Recommended: We recommend you use a model for `#/components/schemas/AgentAccountRestrictions`

This comment is auto-generated by GitHub Actions and is automatically kept up to date as you push.
If you push custom code to the preview branch, re-run this workflow to update the comment.
Last updated: 2026-05-28 18:07:26 UTC

greptile-apps · 2026-05-26T23:31:03Z

Greptile Summary

This PR extends the IncomingTransaction and ReconciliationInstructions schemas to surface crypto receipt data: transactionHash is added as an optional field to ReconciliationInstructions, reference is made optional (previously required), and an optional fees field (int64, smallest currency unit) is added to IncomingTransaction. Both bundled specs (openapi.yaml, mintlify/openapi.yaml) are rebuilt accordingly.

IncomingTransaction.fees — clean addition; integer type, minimum: 0, and a clear description.
ReconciliationInstructions.transactionHash — new optional crypto hash field; no format/pattern constraint, which is acceptable for a cross-chain field.
ReconciliationInstructions.reference — made optional, but the field description still says "must be included with the payment", and no schema constraint prevents an empty {} object when both fields are absent.

Confidence Score: 3/5

Safe to merge once the empty-object gap in ReconciliationInstructions is addressed; the fees addition is clean.

Making reference optional without adding any constraint that at least one of reference or transactionHash must be present means a client could receive a reconciliationInstructions: {} object that carries no matching data at all. That is a logical hole in the schema contract that quietly allows bad data to pass validation. The fees addition and both bundle rebuilds look correct.

openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml — the optionality change and stale description both need attention before merging.

Important Files Changed

Filename	Overview
openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml	Makes `reference` optional and adds `transactionHash`; stale "must be included" description and no constraint preventing a fully-empty object.
openapi/components/schemas/transactions/IncomingTransaction.yaml	Adds optional `fees` field (int64, minimum 0) to incoming transactions; straightforward and well-formed.
openapi.yaml	Generated bundle reflecting the source schema changes; no issues beyond those already flagged in the source files.
mintlify/openapi.yaml	Mintlify-targeted generated bundle; identical changes to openapi.yaml, no independent issues.

Sequence Diagram

sequenceDiagram
    participant Client
    participant GridAPI

    Client->>GridAPI: "GET /transactions/{id}"
    GridAPI-->>Client: IncomingTransaction response
    note over Client,GridAPI: New optional fields in response
    note right of GridAPI: fees (int64, min 0)<br/>reconciliationInstructions.transactionHash
    note right of GridAPI: reconciliationInstructions.reference<br/>is now optional (was required)
    Client->>Client: Handle reconciliationInstructions
    alt reference present
        Client->>Client: Use reference for payment matching
    else transactionHash present
        Client->>Client: Use transactionHash for crypto receipt
    else neither present (now schema-valid)
        Client->>Client: Empty object — no matching data
    end

Prompt To Fix All With AI

Fix the following 2 code review issues. Work through them one at a time, proposing concise fixes.

---

### Issue 1 of 2
openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml:3-8
**Stale "must be included" wording after making `reference` optional**

The `reference` field description still reads "must be included with the payment", but the `required` constraint was just removed. Any API consumer reading this description will think the field is mandatory when the schema now treats it as optional — the two are in direct conflict.

### Issue 2 of 2
openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml:1-13
**Schema now accepts a fully-empty `ReconciliationInstructions` object**

With both `reference` and `transactionHash` optional, the object `{}` is valid per the schema. The PR description states the intent is to allow a transaction hash *when no payment reference exists*, implying at least one field should always be present. A `minProperties: 1` constraint (or an `anyOf` / `oneOf` requiring at least one of the two fields) would close the gap and prevent a semantically meaningless empty object from passing validation.

_{Reviews (1): Last reviewed commit: "feat(transactions): expose receipt recon..." | Re-trigger Greptile}

github-actions · 2026-05-28T01:25:25Z

⚠️ Breaking OpenAPI changes detected

This PR introduces breaking changes to openapi.yaml:

API Changelog 2025-10-13 vs. 2025-10-13

API Changes

GET /agents/approvals

⚠️ the response property data/items/transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /agents/me/actions

⚠️ the response property data/items/transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /agents/me/actions/{actionId}

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /agents/me/quotes/{quoteId}/execute

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /agents/me/transactions

⚠️ the response property data/items/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /agents/me/transactions/{transactionId}

⚠️ the response property oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /agents/me/transfer-in

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 201

POST /agents/me/transfer-out

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 201

POST /agents/{agentId}/actions/{actionId}/approve

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /agents/{agentId}/actions/{actionId}/reject

⚠️ the response property transaction/allOf[#/components/schemas/TransactionOneOf]/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /sandbox/uma/receive

⚠️ the response property allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /transactions

⚠️ the response property data/items/oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

GET /transactions/{transactionId}

⚠️ the response property oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /transactions/{transactionId}/approve

⚠️ the response property allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /transactions/{transactionId}/reject

⚠️ the response property allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 200

POST /transfer-in

⚠️ the response property oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 201

POST /transfer-out

⚠️ the response property oneOf[subschema #1: Incoming Transaction]/allOf[subschema #2]/reconciliationInstructions/reference became optional for the status 201

Detected by oasdiff. This PR will need approval from an API reviewer before merge.

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 26, 2026 23:29 View deployment

greptile-apps Bot reviewed May 26, 2026

View reviewed changes

Comment thread openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml

Comment thread openapi/components/schemas/common/ReconciliationInstructions.yaml

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from 540a94a to d50e79d Compare May 26, 2026 23:56

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 26, 2026 23:57 View deployment

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from d50e79d to 6be0f2a Compare May 27, 2026 21:04

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 27, 2026 21:04 View deployment

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from 6be0f2a to 26b29d5 Compare May 27, 2026 21:34

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 27, 2026 21:35 View deployment

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from 26b29d5 to 6fa1581 Compare May 27, 2026 21:42

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 27, 2026 21:42 View deployment

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from 6fa1581 to cf02763 Compare May 27, 2026 21:53

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 27, 2026 21:53 View deployment

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from cf02763 to c2613d2 Compare May 27, 2026 22:00

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 27, 2026 22:01 View deployment

github-actions Bot added the breaking-change Introduces a breaking change to the OpenAPI spec label May 28, 2026

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 28, 2026 01:25 View deployment

bsiaotickchong added 2 commits May 28, 2026 10:59

feat(transactions): expose receipt reconciliation fields

8c19172

Require reconciliation instructions content

86be1e7

bsiaotickchong force-pushed the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch from a945aa1 to 86be1e7 Compare May 28, 2026 18:00

vercel Bot deployed to Preview May 28, 2026 18:01 View deployment

pengying approved these changes May 28, 2026

View reviewed changes

bsiaotickchong merged commit 797df4a into main May 28, 2026
7 of 8 checks passed

bsiaotickchong deleted the bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields branch May 28, 2026 18:21

Provide feedback

Saved searches

Use saved searches to filter your results more quickly

Expose transaction receipt fields#507

Expose transaction receipt fields#507
bsiaotickchong merged 2 commits into
mainfrom
bstc/grid-transaction-receipt-fields

bsiaotickchong commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

greptile-apps Bot commented May 26, 2026

Important Files Changed

Sequence Diagram

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

Conversation

bsiaotickchong commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Summary

Implementation Note

Testing

Uh oh!

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

✱ Stainless preview builds for grid

Uh oh!

greptile-apps Bot commented May 26, 2026

Greptile Summary

Confidence Score: 3/5

Important Files Changed

Sequence Diagram

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026 • edited Loading Uh oh! There was an error while loading. Please reload this page.

Uh oh!

⚠️ Breaking OpenAPI changes detected

API Changelog 2025-10-13 vs. 2025-10-13

API Changes

GET /agents/approvals

GET /agents/me/actions

GET /agents/me/actions/{actionId}

POST /agents/me/quotes/{quoteId}/execute

GET /agents/me/transactions

GET /agents/me/transactions/{transactionId}

POST /agents/me/transfer-in

POST /agents/me/transfer-out

POST /agents/{agentId}/actions/{actionId}/approve

POST /agents/{agentId}/actions/{actionId}/reject

POST /sandbox/uma/receive

GET /transactions

GET /transactions/{transactionId}

POST /transactions/{transactionId}/approve

POST /transactions/{transactionId}/reject

POST /transfer-in

POST /transfer-out

Uh oh!

Uh oh!

Reviewers

Assignees

Labels

Projects

Milestone

Development

Uh oh!

2 participants

bsiaotickchong commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

vercel Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented May 26, 2026 •

edited

Loading

github-actions Bot commented May 28, 2026 •

edited

Loading